Showing posts with label jsp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jsp. Show all posts

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Actual plugin development for Maven 2

Ok, so after Googling around and hours of patient command line testing (yeah, I know, it's horrible, you don't have to tell me) I managed to complete my ToLDya plugin for generating TLD files. Hopefully this plugin will be a great aid to people developing JSP tag libraries other than myself. But along the way, I learned a lot about plugin development in Maven, and I'm quite certain that I've got a shitload more to learn.


  1. Starting out with a barebones Mojo from the Maven provided archetype literally doesn't get you much. It gets you just enough to plug into the Maven framework so that maven can actually run your Mojo, but that's about it.

  2. The AbstractMojo provided by Maven is pathetic. It gives you a logger, and that's about it. By default, it does not give you many of the things a plugin is quite likely to want (more about that later)

  3. Despite the fact that Maven 2 was supposed to be the "lessons learned" version of Maven, I don't think that the Maven developers learned much at all. Maven is grossly behind the times, still relying on XDoclet annotations and pre-JDK 5.0 compatibility. Yes, there is something to be said for keeping things backward compatible (especially in a corporate environment, I know), but at some point you have to move on and do better, in this case : getting up to date with the latest JDK (1.6.03 at the time of this writing).

  4. If you need anything (ie from Maven) while writing a Maven plugin, you have to specifically request that it be injected for you. (See the Maven documentation, this is the one area where they're actually good about documenting things and helping out developers)

  5. If your plugin needs to access any of the classes in the project on which it's run, you need to load them yourself with your own classloader. Maven will not give you one (which is pretty ridiculous to my mind).



Here are some important bits of knowledge for doing anything with a Maven plugin:

  • If you need access to anything from the project (ie any information stored in the POM), you'll need to include the following dependency :


    <dependency>
    <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
    <artifactId>maven-project</artifactId>
    <version>${maven.version}</version>
    </dependency>

    In my current POM, the property 'maven.version' is set to 2.0.7. You'll then need to have a property in your plugin Mojo called 'property' (or whatever else you find suitable) and annotate it like so (from within a Javadoc comment of course):



    * @parameter expression="${project}"
    * @required


  • As mentioned previously, if you want to load any of the classes that are in the project on which your plugin is to execute, you have to load them yourself. The same goes for any of the project's dependencies. In order to do this, you'll have to get the list of dependencies (compile, test, runtime) from the MavenProject object ('property', remember?) The MavenProject object has a property called 'runtimeClasspathElements'. This gives you a list of strings that are fully qualified file system paths to the classes in the ${project.build.outputDirectory} as well as all of the dependency JARs on which the client project depends. You'll then have to load them yourself. I did so with a URLClassLoader (part of the JDK). I used the following function for creating the classloader :


    private static URLClassLoader getDependencyClassloader(List dependencies) throws MalformedURLException {
    List classpathUrls = new Vector();

    URL url = null;
    for(int index = dependencies.size() - 1; index >= 0; index--) {
    url = new File(dependencies.get(index)).toURI().toURL();

    classpathUrls.add(
    url.toExternalForm().endsWith(".jar") ?
    url :
    new URL(url.getProtocol(),url.getHost(),url.getPort(),url.getFile() + "/") //add the '/' o indicate a directory );
    }
    URLClassLoader ucl = new URLClassLoader(classpathUrls.toArray(new RL[] {}), Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader());

    return ucl;
    }

    Once you have this class loader, you can use it in the long version of Class.forName() to load any classes you may need, as well as perform any loading logic you need with the .getResources() functions on the classloader.





I'll be doing more plugin development in the coming months I'm sure, so I'll try to post what I learn here, but that's about it for now.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Maven 2 quirks and the "bandwagon"

I recently found myself developing (and using) a lot of small tag libraries to make my life easier when it comes to developing my web applications. The only thing that really gets me is that when I write these tag libraries, I have to manually update all of the TLD (tag library descriptor) files that are necessary for using the tags in JSPs. This irks me and it occurs to me that there's no reason I can't have Maven generate the TLDs for me based on annotations I place on the tag classes. The only problem with this is that no such plugin exists, so I figured that as a foray into Maven plugin development, I'd try making such a plugin as my first try. It is then that I ran across a rather large and bothersome quirk with Maven : it's not entirely ready for Java 5 and up. In fact, rather than using proper Java 5 annotations, it uses XDoclet comment annotations to provide metadata for building plugins, but that's not the quirk. The real quirk is that it can't handle having Java 5 annotations in the same project as the plugin. It can handle Java 5 enums just fine, but not annotations, which seems rather strange to me.

This is all part of the bigger problem of companies not keeping themselves up to date with the latest Java technology and staying with Java 1.4.2 and earlier. Sun has done a great job of maintaining backward compatibility, and there's (almost) no reason that companies shouldn't be upgrading the JVMs on their servers to the latest and greatest versions. The only real reason I can think of is that somewhere in their code, they've used variables named 'enum' which becomes a Java keyword in Java 5 and up (aka Java 1.5, 1.6, etc), and this can be mitigated by refactoring the code. Hell, Eclipse makes that job quick and easy, especially when you really know your keyboard shortcuts. I'm fortunate enough to be able to use Java 6 (and very quickly upgrade to Java 7 as soon as it's released and stable). As much as this is going to make me a snob, I'm getting really tired of being dragged down by other people's need for backward compatibility (and hence also tool developers' appeasement of these people which then affects me). Seriously people, get your act together.